Happy Holidays from the V-BID Center!
- Value-Based Patient Cost-Sharing for Prescription Drugs Needs Broader Implementation
- Innovation Center Announces Changes to MA VBID Model for 2025
- CMS Must Obtain Clinician Input Today to Prevent Access Barriers Tomorrow
- New V-BID Center Video: Equity Implications of Braidwood v. Becerra [...]
- Why Do We Pay So Much For Worthless Care?
- Tackling Overtreatment and Overspending in U.S. Health Care
- Value-Based Formulary-essentials Associated with Reduced Low-Value Drug Use
- How Employers Can Make the Most of Today's Delivery Transformation
- High Out-Of-Pocket Burdens, Medical Debt, And Financial Barriers Post-ACA
- Thune-Carper Bill Would Expand Access to High-Value Services
- Americans Can't Afford Their Health Care Regardless of Coverage
- Workers Are Concerned About Health Care Affordability
- Americans Downgrading Insurance Plans to Cope with Rising Costs
- Employers Eye Deductible-Free Plans [...]
- CMS Medicare Advantage V-BID Model Phase II Progress Report
- Value-Based Insurance Design in Connecticut and Minnesota
- IVI Releases Report on Centering Equity in Value-Based Care
- Strategies to Advance Women’s Health Equity
- 2024 V-BID Summit Save-the-Date [...]
CMS Announces Large Growth in 2024 MA V-BID Model Participation
- Hospital Health Care Prices Don’t Match Online and by Phone
- Women Pay Billions More Out-of-Pocket for Health Care
- The Impact of PBMs on High Drug Costs
- Biden Administration to Ban Medical Debt From Americans’ Credit Scores [...]
- How To Make Sure The Inflation Reduction Act Works For All Patients
- Inflation Reduction Act Addresses Out-of-Pocket Drug Costs
- Approved, but Not Covered: Insurance Coverage is Essential to Health Equity
- Preventive Services and ACA Protections: An Opportunity for Health Equity
- California Lawmakers Consider Plan to Cap Naloxone Cost at $10 [...]
- V-BID Center Infographic: Clinical and Equity Implications of Braidwood v. Becerra
- Limited Upside for Employers to Resume Cost-Sharing on Preventive Services
- Diverse Group of HCOs Support Government’s Effort to Reverse Braidwood v. Becerra
- Patients May Miss Out on Free Coverage of Cancer Screenings and Vaccinations
- Better Care Associated with Medicaid Expansion [...]
- R. 3800: Chronic Disease Flexible Coverage Act
- EBRI Report: Implications of Braidwood v. Becerra
- Preventive Services Still in Place after Court Agreement
- Are We Any Closer to V-BID X?
- Health Insurers Play a Key Role in Health Equity
- Nebraska Limits Insulin Costs [...]
The Chronic Disease Flexible Coverage Act (H.R. 3800), was introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives and approved by the U.S. House Ways and Means Committee by a vote of 34-6.
- Brief: Clinical and Equity Implications of Braidwood v. Becerra
- Use of ACA Preventive Care Potentially Affected by Braidwood v. Becerra
-Braidwood v. Becerra Webinar
-Preventive Care Coverage at a Crossroads
-2% of Adults Reported Not Taking Medication as Prescribed Due to Cost
- Patient Groups Support Court of Appeals Decision to Stay Braidwood v. Becerra Ruling
- Court Decision Could Lead to More than 22 Million Women Losing Access to Mammogram Screenings
- Most Employers Intend to Keep Preventive Services Even after Texas ACA Ruling
- AHCJ Webinar Recording Available: Covering the Lawsuit That Could Limit Free Preventive Care
- Upcoming Event: Braidwood v. Becerra Webinar [...]
- Clinical Implications of The Braidwood Ruling: Use of Pre-ACA Task Force Recommendations
- Webinar: Covering the Lawsuit That Could Limit Free Preventive Care
- Fact Sheet: Braidwood v. Becerra Case on Preventive Services
- Over 1 in 5 Skip Health Care Due to Transportation Barriers
- Advancing Health Technology Assessment Methods that Support Health Equity [...]
- NPR’s On Point Highlights Court Ruling Striking Down ACA’s Preventive Service Provisions
- Justice Department Seeks Stay on Parts of ACA Preventive Services Ruling
- ACA Frequently Asked Questions Addresses Braidwood Ruling
- Insurers Say Free Preventive Care Will Continue While Lawsuit is Appealed
- CMMI Publishes Medicare Advantage V-BID Model Fact Sheet [...]
- ACA Preventive Services Mandate Struck Down by Federal Judge
- Governor Whitmer Takes Action to Protect Coverage for Preventive Healthcare
- 6 in 10 Consumers with Private Insurance Use No-Cost Preventive Services
- Ruling to Block ACA Requirement for No-Cost Preventive Care Is Unpopular
- Patient Cost Exposure and Use of Preventive Care Among Individual Plans [...]
Thursday, March 30: Judge Reed C. O’Connor, of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, granted Braidwood Management Inc.'s request to block Section 2713 of the Public Health Service Act as amended by the ACA, that requires coverage without cost-sharing of preventive services to which the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPTF) assigns a rating of “A” or “B”.
